Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Denis Shapovalov vs Edward Corrie Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shapovalov vs Corrie analysis and find out who is favored!
Denis Shapovalov vs Edward Corrie Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shapovalov 1 - 0 Corrie
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shapovalov has won 45.5% of points on his second serve, while Corrie has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shapovalov, in recent form, has won 47.04% of his opponent's second serve points, while Corrie has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.81% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shapovalov has saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Corrie has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shapovalov has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 14/ 16), with Corrie winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shapovalov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 74/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 21/ 21). Corrie has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 160/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 41/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Shapovalov has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 30.77% of matches (W/L 4/ 9), where as Corrie has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shapovalov winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shapovalov winning 2 and Corrie winning 0. The last match between Shapovalov and Corrie was at the Drummondville Challenger, 15-03-2017, First, I.hard with Denis Shapovalov getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shapovalov and Corrie have played a deciding set 0 times, with Shapovalov winning 0 times and Corrie 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shapovalov winning 0, and Corrie 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shapovalov has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.1 while Corrie has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shapovalov has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Corrie has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shapovalov has converted 34.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Corrie has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
123
Rank
10
High
25
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
215
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
59% (285-195)
Career Total W/L
57% (308-229)
40% (8-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$7,864,410
Career Prize Money
$14,925
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shapovalov VS Corrie H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Denis Shapovalov | Edward Corrie |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:25 | 1:21:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (33/57) | 59% (46/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (28/33) | 65% (30/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (15/24) | 47% (15/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (33/78) | 25% (14/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Shapovalov VS Corrie H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Edward Corrie
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Denis Shapovalov | Edward Corrie |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (8/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (21/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (244/240) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 183 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.55 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 131 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 130.25 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (886/1530) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (680/886) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (293/644) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (47/137) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (574/1584) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Denis Shapovalov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Denis Shapovalov
54%
(
67 of
123)
1st Serve %
55%
(
66 of
119)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
14
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
50%
(
28 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
52 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
119)
125
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Denis Shapovalov
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
8
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Denis Shapovalov
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Denis Shapovalov
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Denis Shapovalov
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Luciano Darderi
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
78 of
135)
16
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
53 of
78)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
57 of
135)
119
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Denis Shapovalov
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
2
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
12
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Edward Corrie Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Edward Corrie
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Edward Corrie
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Jonathan Gray
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Joshua Paris
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Edward Corrie
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Jack Molloy
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Christian Harrison
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Shapovalov Vs Corrie Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Denis Shapovalov
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
